Mar 6, 2012

Maori Party complicit in attack on Maori rights

So the government has announced that s9 will be retained, or replicated according to Bill English, in the mixed ownership act (or whatever it’s going to be called). The new section will read: "Nothing in this Part shall permit the Crown to act in a manner that is inconsistent with the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi. For the avoidance of doubt, ss1 does not apply to persons other than the Crown."

The first thing to notice is the wording “nothing in this part”. Read, the section will not apply to the entire act. Instead, the new section will apply to the parts of the Public Finance Act (PFA) that relate to the mixed ownership companies (the purpose of the PFA is here). This isn’t good enough. The government will retain a controlling stake in the new companies; therefore a treaty clause should operate on the companies themselves – not just the Crown in respect of the PFA. Read, a treaty clause should be inserted in the new act not just the PFA. After all, for all intents and purposes the new companies will be Crown entities.

The second thing to notice is that subsection 1 will not apply to persons other than the Crown. The government reasons that it is impossible to bind non-Crown groups to Treaty clauses. If this is the case, why bother to include a section that states this? Carwyn Jones takes the government to task on this matter.

The government also reasons that s9 as it stands applies only to the Crown and not the SOEs themselves. This is a strange claim. SOEs are Crown entities. A part of the executive. Hence the Treaty clause, hence the ability to OIA an SOE and so on.

This cannot be seen as a win for Maori. Joshua Hitchcock makes the point that s9 is weak as it is and that the entire debacle over retaining the section is an opportunity lost. Rather than having a debate about strengthening treaty rights, we’re having a debate about retaining the weak protections we already have.

Tony Ryall understands that the Maori Party is satisfied with the wording. Well, if that’s the case the Maori Party cannot continue to claim to any credibility as a representative of Maori. This is a weak outcome and not the one Maori signalled they wanted. The government comes out of this looking clean, but the reality is far from it. Contrary to media reports, the status quo has not been maintained, it has been eroded.

The Maori Party will, given their complicity in this, suffer the political consequences. Selling out on ACC changes, the ETS, the 90 day law and the Marine and Coastal Areas Act built the perception that the Maori Party’s principles are flexible, or in other words it built the perception that the party are a bunch of sell outs. Hone Harawira and, but to a lesser extent, Labour have exploited this narrative well. A refusal to walk over s9 will solidify that perception, or that reality as you could credibly argue. This opens the door for a resurgent Labour and a dominant Hone Harawira.

Maori are, without a doubt, better off because of the Maori Party. The party does a poor job selling this proposition, but most Maori know it intuitively. However, this is becoming irrelevant as more and more Maori begin to view the Maori Party as a waste rather than a use. The gains the party has secured this term are minimal and, so far, the losses are substantial. Attacks on s9, TPK, the Maori Policy Unit in MFAT and so on outweigh any good achieved thus far.

I’m confident in picking that this will be the Maori Party’s last term. Turia and Sharples are retiring and Flavell will be on the wrong end of an epic thrashing in Waiariki.


  1. Kei te tika tāu e hoa. Ka ngaro atu Te Pāti Māori. Ko etahi hara kua kore e taea te muru. Ahakoa pēhea to titiro kei te memeha haere te Tiriti i roto i tenei ture hou. Kua whakawaia te Pāti Māori, ā, kua patua.
    I think your prediction as to the demise of the Māori Party is correct. Some sins are forgiveable. Some are not. The Treaty will always be a problem for any Māori party who wants to sit tight with the government whether it be Labour or National.

  2. I agree - Maori Party are gonners

  3. Why don't Maori ask for their name back....I think its an insult how they can call themselves the 'Maori Party'.

  4. pita sharples is so far out of touch its a joke and i agree the maori party will never be for given

  5. I disagree that Maori are better off because of the Maori Party - this example and the deliberate lowering of rights for Maori, in comparison to private shareholders, via the repeal of the Foreshore and Seabed Act have reduced Maori rights and influence and The Maori Party did it.

  6. oops not shareholders but property owners

  7. Ka kite Maori Party...SELLOUTS!

  8. For the Maori Party to claim any victory is definitely premature, unless there is something that they themselves know and no one else their constituents who voted them in.

  9. The treaty gives maori rights over their own property (unneeded really since they have the same property rights as any citizen), it does not give them rights over other peoples property.



1. Anonymous comments will be rejected. Please use your real name or a pseudonym/moniker/etc...
2. No personal abuse. Defamatory comments will be rejected.
3. I'll reject any comment that isn't in good taste.