National shows contempt for our democracy

The National Government acts not according to principle, but according to what is pragmatic and favourable for those with power. From Stuff.co.nz:

The government will introduce legislation suspending the effect of the Supreme Court Urewera judgement after legal advice rendered nearly all police video surveillance footage unlawful. 

Prime Minister John Key today revealed legal advice that almost all use of covert video surveillance by police had been rendered unlawful by the Supreme Court ruling - a decision with potentially significant implications for law and order in New Zealand.

"To give you an idea of the scale of the impact this has, ministers have received advice up to 40 current trials may be affected by this decision and over 50 police operations will be impacted. 

"We therefore have the immediate and pressing concern that police are currently left in a position where they are unable to investigate some serious criminal proceeding." 

Key confirmed that police had been forced to suspend all video surveillance, including major operations, because of the Supreme Court ruling. 

Cabinet had decided today to take legislation to Parliament temporarily suspending the effect of the decision and it intended to pass it next week under urgency. It was seeking cross-party support to do so.

It appears from the Prime Minister’s statement that the Police were employing unlawful investigation methods across numerous cases. Investigation methods that the Chief Justice described as “deliberately unlawful”.

If the Police were aware in the Urewera investigation, which occurred years ago, that they were employing illegal investigatory methods, yet continued to do so in the years following the completion of the Urewera investigation, then the Police must be held to account. The law should not be bent to accommodate law breakers (i.e. the Police), the law should be used against those who break it intentionally.  

Of course we are going to receive no such thing from this Government, in fact, we will receive the opposite. The Prime Minister has indicated his intention to enact retrospective legislation under urgency. This is a gross assault on the rule of law, but on par for a National Government.   

Retrospective legislation is often associated with despots and, in New Zealand, Tories. Laws should apply prospectively and never retrospectively. The enactment of retrospective legislation destroys certainty in the law and is absolutely arbitrary.

A fundamental tenant of the rule of law is freedom from arbitrariness i.e. freedom from the random enactment and application of laws. The government’s actions in this instance represent arbitrariness at its most bitter. It is worth noting that the Search and Surveillance Bill, which is currently before the House, will fix the so called problem that the Police face. Meaning the bill will legalise the currently illegal practises the Police are employing, but the government would rather arbitrariness and ram through new legislation as opposed to pushing the Search and Surveillance Bill up the order paper.    

The Police are not above the law. One of the most basic conceptions of the rule of law is that nobody is above the law. The Police must obey the law and when a transgression occurs the criminal justice system must be invoked against the offender. This applies as much to a law breaking constable as it does to me.

The Police actions in the Urewera investigation represented a blatant breach of our constitution, of which the rule of law is a cornerstone, and a blatant breach of human rights which, therefore, offends s8(d) of the Police Act 2008.

In reality, the Government can legislate how it wants. However, any decent government should carefully balance their right to enact laws against fundamental social and constitutional values. Government’s right to govern is often limited by what is basic and decent in our society as well as the Treaty of Waitangi and the principles of the Treaty, constitutional conventions and, quite importantly, the rule of law. In my opinion the government’s actions represent a form of double jeopardy and will undermine our confidence in democracy. The government’s legislation will validate the evidence the Police illegally obtained meaning charges can be brought against the former accused. This is, as I said, a form of double jeopardy and an affront to notions of democracy, justice and our egalitarian values. No doubt such legislation will violate a host of international laws as well as domestic law.

The government is also sending a big fuck you to the Courts. The government’s actions, or intentions I guess, in this instance illustrate how authoritarian this government is. This is the daddy state. A government that rules for those in power. As a Maori, I have no confidence in this government. They do not govern in my interests. This government undermines Maori confidence in our democracy. The sooner we turf these pig-headed losers out the better. 

See also: NRT, Imperator Fish, Political Dumpground, Robert Winter, Tumeke, The Dim Post and Gordon Campbell. But for the best analysis see this piece from Dean Kinight of Vic Law School and Andrew Geddis of Otago. 

Breaking News: Charges dropped against "Urewera 15"

All firearms charges have been dropped against the so called "Urewera 15". This is an embarrassing back down from the Police, but the correct outcome. I am pleased and the Maori world is pleased. The decision comes after the Supreme Court ruled certain evidence inadmissible, therefore overruling previous judgments from the High Court and the Court of Appeal. Criminal charges have hung over the heads of the defendants for over four years causing massive emotional trauma including relationship breakdowns and bankruptcy. Justice has finally come for 11 members of the group, but four members, including Tame Iti, will face the minor charge of participating in a criminal group. No doubt this is in an attempt to save face, but also smash Tame Iti and co. who are no friends of the system. Hopefully, the pigs run into all the criticism they deserve for pursuing what was, from the very beginning, a wild fantasy.   

Jane Kelsey on Native Affairs and Operation 8

There have been two developments in the so called Urewera terror saga. Firstly, the Urewera 15 are seeking leave to appeal to the Supreme Court. Secondly, a film chronicling and commenting on events since the raids in 2007 has opened in Auckland. The film is called Operation 8: Deep in the Forest and is directed by Errol Wright and Abi King-Jones.

On the first issue I recommend, in fact I urge you, to go watch Julian Wilcox’s interview with Professor Jane Kelsey on Native Affairs (episode 05/06). Prof. Kelsey is fiercely intelligent and sympathetic towards things Maori. I wish she was an MP – she’d be outstanding. In the interview Prof. Kelsey makes the pertinent point that the needs of the system are been put ahead of the rights of the accused. She goes on to discuss the advantages of a jury trail in this particular case as well as the personal effect the process is having and has had on the accused and their whanau. I thought she framed the issue better than anyone has so far.    

On the second issue I’ll point you to the Standard where Rocky has written an excellent review of the film. The post is fairly comprehensive and incredibly informative.

So go and watch the Jane Kelsey’s interview and read Rocky’s review. They put it far better than I ever could.